Home > Just and fair to all?, Main blog > Nigel Lynn responds to Littlehampton Town Council – let’s hope they call his bluff!

Nigel Lynn responds to Littlehampton Town Council – let’s hope they call his bluff!


.

On 13th March 2013 Littlehampton Town Council wrote to Nigel Lynn, Chief Exectuve of Arun District Council to raise concerns relating to the draft Leisure Strategy. The e-mail is below.

Here is Mr Lynn’s response: ADC response to LTC re Draft Leisure Strategy 19 3 2013

Mr Lynn’s response is evasive, dismissive and shows a blatant disregard for the legitimate concerns raised by LTC on behalf of the public. Let’s hope that LTC call Mr Lynn’s bluff by complaining to the Ombudsman!

LETTER SENT BY EMAIL

Littlehampton Town Clerk to Arun District Council

Mr. Nigel Lynn
Chief Executive, Arun District Council
Arun Civic Centre, Maltravers Road
Littlehampton, West Sussex
BN175lF

13th March 2013

Dear Nigel,

ARUN DISTRICT COUNCIL DRAFT LEISURE STRATEGY

Last Thursday evening, the Town Council heard that at a meeting attended by your Council Leader, Cabinet Member for Leisure and you with the Chief Executive of Inspire leisure, it was agreed that, amongst other things, cinema and theatre were removed (from April 2013) from the list of core activities that Inspire are contracted to provide.

My Council believes that this is an amazing and very concerning revelation for a number of reasons and has asked me to write to you accordingly. Our concerns are:

(1)        At the public meeting at Littlehampton Town Council on 2nd October last year and at many subsequent meetings including the recent ADC/lTC Liaison meeting, considerable emphasis has been put upon the lack of willingness, by Inspire leisure, to buy a digital projector. It was frequently claimed that this was not a matter for the District Council and, furthermore, that Inspire had the funds to buy such equipment. It was just that they chose not to do so. This appears, however, to not be the case. It would have been very surprising if Inspire had decided to purchase a digital projector, given that to address Arun’s funding cutbacks it had been relieved of its duty to provide such a service back in July 2012.

(2)        It is very difficult to see why the leisure Strategy was required. It would appear that key decisions have been taken well in advance of its findings. Surely it would have been relevant for the public and other consultees to have been made aware that this decision had been taken. This would perhaps have taken the discussions in a different direction. It appears that we have been fed a red herring to distract us from the other elements of the review. Many members of the public have spent a huge amount of time campaigning to save the Windmill, cinema and theatre in the Town, hoping to sway the decision makers. This is how democracy should work. We have to ask why they were not informed that they were too late?

(3)        On the question of the decision back in July, why was this not made public and why did it not go through the normal decision making procedures at the District Council? We and others would have been able to pick this up and comment and lobby accordingly. Even if it is claimed that this was not a full and final decision, the impact of it was that, well in advance of the new financial year, decisions were being made that impacted significantly on services, particularly in the case of Inspire when they were agreeing their budget. Have the District Council considered whether the handling of this decision would satisfy the Ombudsman or legal challenge? This also raises several other questions. When would this decision have been reported to Councilor through the appropriate mechanisms? Is it a decision that is now open to call-in as it has only just been publicised? Are there any other major decisions that have been taken that affect the general well-being of the Town, but have not been made public?

(4)        Whilst there are many other issues that this raises, not least the validity of the Leisure Strategy exercise, we would still ask, as an example of our disquiet, why the cinema was allowed to cease functioning in mid- February when even the hidden decision says that it would cease from April 2013. This exemplifies the apparent disregard of the public, the emerging Leisure Strategy and due process that has been at the forefront of shutting down highly valued local services in an unacceptable and underhand way.

We would be very interested in your response to these points and hope that they will be considered at your Council meeting on Wednesday.

Yours sincerely

Peter Herbert

Town Clerk

cc Littlehampton Town Councillors
Cllr. Mrs Brown
Cllr. Dendle
Roger Green
David Warne
Larry Haas
Other press contacts

Advertisements
  1. Flid
    March 21, 2013 at 10:03 pm

    This is great they have to answer me thinks mrs browns boys days numbered fantastic they are so not doing it properly well done

  1. No trackbacks yet.

Leave a comment

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: