Home > Just and fair to all? > Is the council’s 400 houses p.a. “preference” genuine or a sham?

Is the council’s 400 houses p.a. “preference” genuine or a sham?

Arun District Council has confirmed that it received a copy of the first draft of the emerging Strategic Housing Market Assessment Update 2012  for Coastal West Sussex (SHMA) on 7th June 2012.

This was 13 days before the Full Council meeting of 20th June 2012, at which, the council approved the first draft of its emerging Local Plan for public consultation, including the council’s “preference” for a house building rate of 400 houses p.a.

This was 6 weeks before the commencement of the draft Local Plan public consultation on 19th July 2012.

The Cabinet Member for Planning and Infrastructure has confirmed that members of the Local Plan Sub-Committee received a briefing by consultants in May 2012 on some of the emerging conclusions in the SHMA and that Cabinet and non-Cabinet Members had access to the same information when voting at the Special Full Council meeting on 20th June 2012.

It seems that members of the council were fully aware of the essence of the emerging SHMA before they agreed the council’s “preference” for 400 houses p.a.

We now know that the SHMA recommends an annual house building rate of 575 houses p.a.

So was the council’s “preference” for 400 house p.a. genuine or was it a ploy to create “false hope” amongst the public?

Would it be better, from Arun’s point of view, if the public campaigned for a smaller housing number rather than talking about alternative strategic locations?

If Arun’s councillors made their decision for a “preference” of 400 houses p.a. with full knowledge that the SHMA was likely to recommend a much higher housing number then they cannot, at a later stage, use the SHMA as their justification for an increase in the housing numbers. They knew the essence of the SHMA when they set their “preference”.

So – was the recent draft Local Plan consultation, with its “preference” for a house building rate of 400 houses p.a. genuine or a sham?

Time will tell!

  1. No comments yet.
  1. No trackbacks yet.

Leave a comment

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: